Game #68 - March 3, 2020 - Montreal 6 at N.Y. Islanders 2
Game #68 - March 3, 2020
  Montreal   6   at     N.Y. Islanders   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
62 Lehkonen24 Danault11 Gallagher
 8:12 8:12 0:00 0:00 +1
54 Hudon71 Evans22 Weise
 7:13 7:13 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki40 Armia
 6:12 6:12 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron13 Domi43 Weal
 6:05 6:05 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron14 Suzuki40 Armia
 5:14 5:14 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 2:41 2:41 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon13 Domi43 Weal
 2:37 2:37 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:05 0:00 0:00 2:05 E
41 Byron24 Danault11 Gallagher
 1:33 1:33 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia41 Byron
 1:30 0:00 0:00 1:30 +2
54 Hudon14 Suzuki40 Armia
 1:27 1:27 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault41 Byron
 1:17 0:00 0:00 1:17 E
54 Hudon14 Suzuki22 Weise
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron71 Evans40 Armia
 1:01 1:01 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:51 10:32 0:00 1:19 +2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
77 Kulak26 Petry
 19:18 18:13 0:00 1:05 +1
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 19:05 16:21 0:00 2:44 +1
61 Ouellet32 Folin
 11:40 11:40 0:00 0:00 +1
61 Ouellet26 Petry
 1:57 0:16 0:00 1:41 +1
77 Kulak61 Ouellet
 1:23 1:23 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 1:16 1:12 0:00 0:04 E
77 Kulak  6 Weber
 1:12 1:12 0:00 0:00 +1
77 Kulak32 Folin
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:05 2:28 0:00 0:37 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 62AL
24PD
11BG		 54CH
71JE
22DW		 62AL
14NS
40JA		 41PB
13MD
43JW		 41PB
14NS
40JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 54CH
13MD
43JW		 24PD
62AL		 77BK
26JP		 8BC
6SW		 61XO
32CF
7 Eberle - 13 Barzal - 27 Lee 0:49 1:39 2:35 0:18 0:06 0:12 0:01   3:54 1:34 1:02
28 Dal Colle - 29 Nelson - 12 Bailey 0:31 0:56 0:50 1:54 0:01   0:34   2:27 0:53 1:19
18 Beauvillier - 13 Barzal - 7 Eberle 1:01       0:01   1:02   1:30 1:42 0:30
18 Beauvillier - 44 Pageau - 47 Komarov 1:05   0:29 0:05   2:19     0:39 3:16  
28 Dal Colle - 44 Pageau - 10 Brassard   0:19     0:36   0:32   2:12   1:33
17 Martin - 47 Komarov - 15 Clutterbuck 0:01 0:47             0:52 0:58 1:01
12 Bailey - 29 Nelson - 27 Lee 2:37       0:49       0:07 2:19 1:15
17 Martin - 10 Brassard - 15 Clutterbuck 0:36 0:38   1:18 0:40       1:04 0:06 1:39
18 Beauvillier - 29 Nelson - 15 Clutterbuck 0:17   0:34 0:20 0:10   0:15   1:08 0:23 1:11
28 Dal Colle - 44 Pageau - 12 Bailey 0:29     0:52 0:53       0:42 1:20 0:19
18 Beauvillier - 10 Brassard - 12 Bailey - 29 Nelson       0:02       1:06 0:05 0:52 0:02
4 Greene - 6 Pulock 3:01 0:44 1:50 1:07 1:18 0:39 0:19   5:44 3:17 2:05
24 Mayfield - 25 Toews 0:34 1:36 2:26 2:04 0:54 1:02 0:26   4:47 3:04 1:36
2 Leddy - 55 Boychuk 1:05 1:38 0:58 0:06 1:31 0:50 0:31   3:00 3:33 2:14
2 Leddy - 6 Pulock 1:20 0:19 0:05 0:50   0:03   0:16 0:55 1:08 0:26
4 Greene - 24 Mayfield 0:56 0:38 0:48           1:05 0:56 0:03
6 Pulock   0:26           0:31   1:15  
6 Pulock - 24 Mayfield 0:28   0:05 1:02 0:02   0:07   0:49   1:23
2 Leddy - 4 Greene         0:33       1:00 0:09 0:03
2 Leddy - 24 Mayfield   0:09     0:08   0:55     1:11 1:11
25 Toews               0:43 0:31 0:47  
2 Leddy - 25 Toews   0:08   0:23 0:47       0:02 1:19 0:29

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 59.3% 59.3%    
Tatar-Danault 19.4% 19.4%    
Byron-Danault 11.2% 11.2%    
Hudon-Danault 6.1% 6.1%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 41.5% 41.5%    
Hudon-Weal 17.8% 17.8%    
Suzuki-Armia 6.4% 6.4%    
Lehkonen-Armia 5.7% 5.7%    
Lehkonen-Weal 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 23.3% 23.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 37.3% 37.3%    
Byron-Armia 31.5% 31.5%    
Hudon-Armia 8.7% 8.7%    
Hudon-Weise 6.2% 6.2%    
Domi-Armia 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 10.6% 9.8%   0.8%
Totals   99.2%   0.8%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Evans 65.2% 65.2%    
Hudon-Suzuki 9.3% 9.3%    
Domi-Suzuki 6.8% 6.8%    
Evans 6.8%     6.8%
Weal-Evans 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 8.1% 8.1%    
Totals   93.2%   6.8%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Gallagher 45.0% 45.0%    
Tatar-Gallagher 14.7% 14.7%    
Lehkonen 11.4%     11.4%
Byron-Gallagher 8.5% 8.5%    
Byron 7.0%     7.0%
Others 13.3% 10.9%   2.4%
Totals   79.1%   20.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 33.3% 33.3%    
Byron-Suzuki 28.1% 28.1%    
Byron 8.1%     8.1%
Hudon-Suzuki 7.8% 7.8%    
Byron-Evans 5.5% 5.5%    
Others 17.2% 17.2%    
Totals   91.9%   8.1%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Weal 32.6% 32.6%    
Suzuki-Armia 28.0% 28.0%    
Danault-Gallagher 8.3% 8.3%    
Armia 8.0%     8.0%
Danault 6.9%     6.9%
Others 16.2% 15.5%   0.7%
Totals   84.4%   15.6%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Domi 46.7% 46.7%    
Hudon-Domi 20.1% 20.1%    
Hudon-Evans 6.5% 6.5%    
Lehkonen-Domi 6.0% 6.0%    
Evans-Domi 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 15.9% 15.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Weise 47.5% 47.5%    
Domi-Weal 17.2% 17.2%    
Suzuki-Armia 9.5% 9.5%    
Suzuki-Weise 6.8% 6.8%    
Danault-Gallagher 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 13.4% 13.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 42.9% 42.9%    
Suzuki-Armia 32.4% 32.4%    
Danault 10.9%     10.9%
Domi-Armia 4.4% 4.4%    
Domi-Weal 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 5.3% 5.3%    
Totals   89.1%   10.9%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Weise 63.1% 63.1%    
Byron-Armia 8.9% 8.9%    
Hudon-Weal 7.4% 7.4%    
Weise 6.6%     6.6%
Domi-Weal 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 8.6% 8.6%    
Totals   93.4%   6.6%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 97.6% 97.6%    
Domi-Weal 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 87.3% 74.8%   12.5%
Kulak 5.5% 5.5%    
Ouellet 3.9% 3.0%   0.8%
Petry 2.5% 0.5%   2.0%
Chiarot-Ouellet 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   84.7%   15.3%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 86.6% 74.2%   12.4%
Petry 5.7% 5.4%   0.3%
Ouellet 4.3% 4.3%    
Kulak 2.5% 2.5%    
Ouellet-Weber 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   87.3%   12.7%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 83.7% 79.0%   4.7%
Ouellet 8.5% 1.2%   7.3%
Chiarot 5.5% 5.2%   0.3%
Weber 2.4% 0.5%   1.9%
Totals   85.8%   14.2%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ouellet 91.6% 91.6%    
Kulak 8.4% 8.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
61 Ouellet
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 68.7% 68.7%    
Petry 11.5% 1.6%   9.9%
Kulak 8.1% 8.1%    
Chiarot 5.6% 5.6%    
Weber 5.0% 3.9%   1.1%
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   89.0%   11.0%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 82.1% 77.5%   4.6%
Ouellet 5.9% 5.9%    
Weber 5.1% 5.1%    
Folin 4.5% 4.5%    
Chiarot 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   95.4%   4.6%
Back to main page