Game #16 - February 20, 2021 - Toronto 5 at Montreal 3
Game #16 - February 20, 2021
  Toronto   5   at     Montreal   3
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
73 Toffoli24 Danault11 Gallagher
 13:00 13:00 0:00 0:00 +1
92 Drouin14 Suzuki17 Anderson
 12:42 12:42 0:00 0:00 -1
41 Byron71 Evans62 Lehkonen
 10:02 9:56 0:06 0:00 +1
90 Tatar15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 9:21 9:21 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault
 1:18 0:00 0:00 1:18 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:17 0:00 0:00 1:17 E
41 Byron71 Evans17 Anderson
 1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 40 Armia - 73 Toffoli - 92 Drouin 1:00 0:00 1:00 0:00 E
Others 10:10 8:36 0:54 0:40 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 18:56 17:34 0:00 1:22 -1
44 Edmundson26 Petry
 16:23 16:23 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete27 Romanov
 15:41 15:41 0:00 0:00 +2
  6 Weber26 Petry
 2:01 2:01 0:00 0:00 E
44 Edmundson  6 Weber
 1:18 0:00 0:00 1:18 E
  8 Chiarot44 Edmundson
 1:04 0:40 0:06 0:18 E
  6 Weber
 1:01 0:00 1:01 0:00 E
Others 3:36 2:26 0:53 0:17 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 73TT
24PD
11BG		 92JD
14NS
17JA		 41PB
71JE
62AL		 90TT
15JK
40JA		 8BC
6SW		 44JE
26JP		 53VM
27AR		 6SW
26JP
11 Hyman - 47 Engvall - 65 Mikheyev 0:02 5:03 0:50 4:56 1:05 1:18 9:17  
15 Kerfoot - 91 Tavares - 88 Nylander 0:16 6:00 1:54 1:42 0:13 10:05 0:28 0:12
16 Marner - 34 Matthews - 97 Thornton 8:45 0:08 1:00 0:25 9:22 1:12 0:17 0:34
26 Vesey - 19 Spezza - 72 Boyd 0:49 0:03 4:33 0:52 1:32 0:56 3:51  
44 Rielly - 78 Brodie 4:45 3:54 4:07 2:10 5:47 4:29 5:35 1:21
3 Holl - 8 Muzzin 2:19 5:34 3:36 3:13 3:06 6:57 6:20 0:19
22 Bogosian - 23 Dermott 5:18 2:44 1:19 2:38 6:39 3:22 2:09 0:15
44 Rielly         1:22      

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Danault 89.4% 89.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Anderson-Tatar 5.7%   5.7%  
Toffoli-Kotkaniemi 1.8% 1.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Anderson-Toffoli 0.9% 0.9%    
Drouin-Danault 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Anderson 72.8% 72.8%    
Armia-Toffoli-Drouin 5.7%   5.7%  
Kotkaniemi-Anderson-Toffoli 4.7% 4.7%    
Byron 3.8% 3.8%    
Toffoli-Anderson 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 10.0% 9.6% 0.4%  
Totals   93.9% 6.1%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Armia 69.8% 69.8%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Tatar 6.2%   6.2%  
Suzuki-Anderson-Toffoli 6.1% 6.1%    
Armia 3.6% 3.6%    
Toffoli-Armia 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 11.6% 11.1% 0.5%  
Totals   93.3% 6.7%  
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Suzuki 72.2% 72.2%    
Byron-Evans 6.6% 6.6%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 4.7%   4.7%  
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Toffoli 4.6% 4.6%    
Toffoli-Suzuki 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 8.9% 8.9%    
Totals   95.3% 4.7%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Gallagher 75.1% 75.1%    
  7.5%     7.5%
Lehkonen 7.4%     7.4%
Toffoli-Anderson 2.4% 2.4%    
Drouin-Anderson 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 5.7% 5.7%    
Totals   85.1%   14.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 68.7% 68.7%    
Suzuki-Toffoli-Drouin 7.3%   7.3%  
Kotkaniemi 3.5% 3.5%    
Tatar-Suzuki 2.9% 2.9%    
Toffoli-Kotkaniemi 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 14.8% 12.2% 0.5% 2.1%
Totals   90.1% 7.8% 2.1%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Lehkonen 78.8% 78.0% 0.8%  
Evans-Anderson 9.2% 9.2%    
Suzuki 5.2% 5.2%    
Evans 2.4%     2.4%
Kotkaniemi-Armia 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   96.9% 0.8% 2.4%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Evans 81.7% 80.9% 0.8%  
Danault 10.4%     10.4%
Kotkaniemi-Armia 2.7% 2.7%    
Byron-Suzuki 0.9% 0.9%    
Drouin-Evans 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 3.3% 2.6%   0.7%
Totals   88.1% 0.8% 11.1%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Lehkonen 80.9% 80.1% 0.8%  
Byron-Anderson 9.4% 9.4%    
Byron 2.4%     2.4%
Armia 2.3%     2.3%
Drouin-Anderson 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 3.9% 3.2%   0.7%
Totals   93.8% 0.8% 5.4%
73 Toffoli
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 72.5% 72.5%    
Suzuki-Armia-Drouin 5.6%   5.6%  
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Anderson 4.6% 4.6%    
Drouin 3.7% 3.7%    
Suzuki-Anderson 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 10.8% 10.8%    
Totals   94.4% 5.6%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 82.6% 82.6%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Anderson 7.4%   7.4%  
Suzuki-Anderson 4.0% 4.0%    
Suzuki-Armia 3.5% 3.5%    
Danault-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   92.6% 7.4%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Anderson 80.8% 80.8%    
Suzuki-Armia-Toffoli 6.4%   6.4%  
Toffoli 4.2% 4.2%    
Suzuki-Armia 2.2% 2.2%    
Danault-Anderson 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 4.2% 3.8% 0.4%  
Totals   93.2% 6.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 79.2% 73.5%   5.7%
Petry 8.4% 8.4%    
Edmundson 5.4%     5.4%
  4.3%   4.3%  
Mete 2.6% 2.6%    
Totals   84.6% 4.3% 11.2%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 90.9% 84.3%   6.6%
Edmundson 5.1% 3.2% 0.5% 1.4%
Mete 2.3% 2.3%    
Petry 1.4% 1.4%    
Romanov 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   91.5% 0.5% 8.0%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Edmundson 80.1% 80.1%    
Weber 9.9% 9.9%    
  4.3%   4.3%  
Romanov 3.4% 2.0%   1.4%
Chiarot 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   94.3% 4.3% 1.4%
27 Romanov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 93.3% 93.3%    
Petry 4.2% 2.5%   1.7%
Edmundson 2.3% 2.3%    
Chiarot 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   98.3%   1.7%
44 Edmundson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 85.6% 85.6%    
Weber 6.8%     6.8%
Chiarot 5.6% 3.5% 0.5% 1.6%
Romanov 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   91.1% 0.5% 8.4%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Romanov 92.4% 92.4%    
Weber 3.7% 3.7%    
Chiarot 2.8% 2.8%    
Petry 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page