Game #31 - March 20, 2021 - Vancouver 4 at Montreal 5 (SO)
Game #31 - March 20, 2021
  Vancouver   4   at     Montreal   5     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin14 Suzuki17 Anderson
 14:08 14:08 0:00 0:00 -2
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 13:31 13:31 0:00 0:00 +3
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 10:27 10:27 0:00 0:00 -1
41 Byron71 Evans94 Perry
 7:16 7:16 0:00 0:00 E
94 Perry92 Drouin17 Anderson
 1:05 1:05 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 17 Anderson - 24 Danault - 92 Drouin 1:00 0:00 1:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar15 Kotkaniemi11 Gallagher
 1:00 1:00 0:00 0:00 E
Others 16:33 14:53 0:00 1:40 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
77 Kulak26 Petry
 20:13 20:13 0:00 0:00 E
44 Edmundson  6 Weber
 18:41 17:37 0:00 1:04 -1
27 Romanov53 Mete
 13:13 13:13 0:00 0:00 +1
26 Petry
 2:49 2:49 0:00 0:00 E
 
 2:11 2:11 0:00 0:00 E
44 Edmundson27 Romanov
 1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber26 Petry
 1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 1:00 0:00 1:00 0:00 E
Others 4:21 3:45 0:00 0:36 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
14NS
17JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
15JK
40JA		 41PB
71JE
94CP		 77BK
26JP		 44JE
6SW		 27AR
53VM		 26JP
36 Hoglander - 53 Horvat - 6 Boeser 5:20 3:01 1:30 1:04 9:03 3:52 0:52    
24 Vesey - 9 Miller - 18 Virtanen 2:53 4:44 0:04 0:54 2:35 5:51 0:36    
13 Hawryluk - 20 Sutter - 64 Motte 1:39 2:20 2:29 3:18 2:16 1:32 5:54    
26 Roussel - 96 Gaudette - 71 MacEwen 0:28 0:32 2:53 0:44 1:17 0:10 2:59    
9 Miller - 6 Boeser               1:38 1:02
23 Edler - 88 Schmidt 7:08 3:38 4:52 2:02 6:34 5:53 6:57    
27 Hamonic - 43 Hughes 4:57 4:21 2:29 2:30 6:48 7:36 2:42    
8 Benn - 57 Myers 2:03 4:35 2:39 1:50 5:34 4:01 3:22    
43 Hughes   0:30       0:51   2:17 1:25

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 85.4% 85.4%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 6.3% 6.3%    
Anderson 2.2% 2.2%    
Drouin-Suzuki 1.8% 1.8%    
Perry-Drouin 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Anderson 69.5% 69.5%    
Anderson-Danault-Drouin 4.9%   4.9%  
Drouin-Byron 4.8% 4.8%    
Byron-Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.6%    
Drouin-Perry 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 14.1% 13.0%   1.1%
Totals   94.0% 4.9% 1.1%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 60.8% 60.8%    
Tatar-Gallagher 5.8% 5.8%    
Armia-Perry 5.5% 5.5%    
Tatar-Armia 5.2% 5.2%    
Byron-Suzuki 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 18.3% 18.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Suzuki 76.3% 76.3%    
Perry-Drouin 5.9% 5.9%    
Suzuki-Danault-Drouin 5.4%   5.4%  
Drouin 2.4% 2.4%    
Tatar-Danault 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 7.7% 7.7%    
Totals   94.6% 5.4%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 74.6% 74.6%    
Suzuki-Anderson-Drouin 5.5%   5.5%  
Armia 4.7%     4.7%
Tatar 4.4% 4.4%    
Tatar-Armia 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 7.4% 7.4%    
Totals   89.8% 5.5% 4.7%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 70.4% 70.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Perry 6.4% 6.4%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 6.1% 6.1%    
Danault 5.7%     5.7%
Tatar-Danault 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 7.3% 7.3%    
Totals   94.3%   5.7%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Perry 63.4% 63.4%    
Drouin-Suzuki 8.4% 8.4%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 6.4% 6.4%    
Lehkonen 5.2%     5.2%
Lehkonen-Evans 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 11.6% 11.6%    
Totals   94.8%   5.2%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 79.7% 79.7%    
Byron 4.6%     4.6%
Evans-Byron 4.3% 4.3%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 2.8% 2.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Perry 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   95.4%   4.6%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Perry 76.2% 76.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Perry 7.5% 7.5%    
Lehkonen-Byron 5.9% 5.9%    
Tatar-Perry 2.6% 2.6%    
Lehkonen-Perry 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 5.4% 5.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 72.6% 72.6%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 5.4% 5.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 4.8% 4.8%    
Danault 4.3% 4.3%    
Danault-Armia 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 9.6% 9.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Anderson 66.6% 66.6%    
Perry-Anderson 5.1% 5.1%    
Suzuki-Anderson-Danault 4.7%   4.7%  
Suzuki-Byron 4.6% 4.6%    
Kotkaniemi 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 15.9% 14.8%   1.0%
Totals   94.3% 4.7% 1.0%
94 Perry
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Evans 57.1% 57.1%    
Drouin-Anderson 8.5% 8.5%    
Armia-Kotkaniemi 7.5% 7.5%    
Evans-Kotkaniemi 5.6% 5.6%    
Drouin-Suzuki 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 16.1% 16.1%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Edmundson 85.4% 80.6%   4.9%
Petry 5.3% 5.3%    
  4.6%   4.6%  
Romanov 2.5% 2.5%    
Kulak 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   90.5% 4.6% 4.9%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 79.1% 79.1%    
  11.0% 11.0%    
Weber 4.6% 4.6%    
Romanov 3.0% 0.7%   2.3%
Edmundson 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   97.7%   2.3%
27 Romanov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 78.6% 78.6%    
Edmundson 8.1% 8.1%    
Kulak 5.5% 5.5%    
Petry 4.6% 1.0%   3.6%
Weber 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   96.4%   3.6%
44 Edmundson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 87.4% 82.4%   5.0%
Romanov 6.4% 6.4%    
Kulak 3.4% 3.4%    
Petry 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   95.0%   5.0%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Romanov 97.7% 97.7%    
Kulak 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 89.3% 89.3%    
Romanov 4.0% 4.0%    
Edmundson 3.2% 3.2%    
Weber 2.1% 2.1%    
Mete 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page