Game #33 - April 1, 2021 - Montreal 4 at Ottawa 1

Game #33 - April 1, 2021

Montreal

Ottawa

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.

NHL.com links:

Scoresheet Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play

Lines and defensive pairings

Line

Time

+/-

92 Drouin

14 Suzuki

17 Anderson

13:24

13:24

0:00

90 Tatar

24 Danault

11 Gallagher

10:31

10:31

0:00

41 Byron

15 Kotkaniemi

62 Lehkonen

10:08

10:08

0:00

67 Frolik

71 Evans

94 Perry

8:21

8:21

0:00

11 Gallagher - 15 Kotkaniemi - 90 Tatar - 94 Perry

3:28

0:02

3:26

0:00

14 Suzuki - 17 Anderson - 24 Danault - 92 Drouin

2:07

0:07

2:00

0:00

67 Frolik

15 Kotkaniemi

94 Perry

1:20

1:20

0:00

Others

10:41

8:00

0:34

2:07

Pair

Time

+/-

44 Edmundson

6 Weber

17:41

15:34

0:00

2:07

77 Kulak

26 Petry

17:26

17:26

0:00

27 Romanov

53 Mete

14:15

14:15

0:00

26 Petry

3:16

0:02

3:14

0:00

6 Weber

2:45

0:04

2:41

0:00

44 Edmundson

77 Kulak

1:22

1:22

0:00

44 Edmundson

26 Petry

1:03

0:58

0:05

0:00

Others

2:12

2:12

0:00

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair

92JD
14NS
17JA

90TT
24PD
11BG

41PB
15JK
62AL

67MF
71JE
94CP

11BG
15JK
90TT
94CP

14NS
17JA
24PD
92JD

44JE
6SW

77BK
26JP

27AR
53VM

26JP

6SW

7 Tkachuk - 9 Norris - 63 Dadonov

1:48

0:35

5:35

0:45

5:59

4:21

0:04

18 StÜtzle - 71 Tierney - 19 Batherson

0:52

3:56

0:55

3:12

1:21

1:49

6:32

36 White - 13 Paul - 28 Brown

2:48

3:28

0:37

1:04

2:56

2:43

2:40

59 Formenton - 62 Bishop - 10 Dzingel

2:14

0:35

0:20

0:47

0:37

3:20

0:36

10 Dzingel - 13 Paul - 28 Brown

2:32

0:53

0:06

1:43

1:19

7 Tkachuk - 9 Norris - 19 Batherson

0:22

0:26

0:01

0:41

0:21

0:44

22 Zaitsev - 72 Chabot

6:15

5:06

2:37

1:53

4:22

9:50

3:37

2 Zub - 5 Reilly

4:08

3:36

3:19

1:28

5:25

3:53

4:34

3 Brown - 55 Coburn

1:25

0:56

3:54

4:26

0:47

0:22

4:26

3:05

3:46

0:42

0:48

2 Zub - 22 Zaitsev

0:12

0:01

2:39

1:45

0:01

0:02

0:03

2:32

1:57

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Tatar-Danault	66.1%	66.1%
Kotkaniemi-Tatar-Perry	21.8%	0.2%	21.6%
Drouin-Suzuki	2.4%	2.4%
Tatar-Suzuki	2.4%	2.4%
Lehkonen-Danault	2.2%	2.2%
Others	5.1%	2.8%	2.3%
Totals		76.1%	23.9%

14 Suzuki

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Drouin-Anderson	73.0%	73.0%
Anderson-Danault-Drouin	11.5%	0.6%	10.9%
Byron-Anderson	2.3%	2.3%
Tatar-Anderson	2.2%	2.2%
Tatar-Gallagher	2.1%	2.1%
Others	9.0%	6.4%	2.6%
Totals		86.5%	13.5%

15 Kotkaniemi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Byron-Lehkonen	60.2%	60.2%
Gallagher-Tatar-Perry	20.6%	0.2%	20.4%
Frolik-Perry	7.9%	7.9%
Drouin-Anderson	2.4%	2.4%
Lehkonen-Anderson	1.9%	1.9%
Others	7.0%	5.3%	1.7%
Totals		77.9%	22.1%

17 Anderson

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Drouin-Suzuki	70.4%	70.4%
Suzuki-Danault-Drouin	11.1%	0.6%	10.5%
Frolik-Evans	4.1%	4.1%
Drouin-Danault	2.3%	2.3%
Byron-Suzuki	2.2%	2.2%
Others	9.9%	8.8%	1.1%
Totals		88.4%	11.6%

24 Danault

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Tatar-Gallagher	65.6%	65.6%
Suzuki-Anderson-Drouin	13.2%	0.7%	12.5%
Lehkonen	5.2%			5.2%
Drouin-Anderson	2.7%	2.7%
Frolik	2.6%	0.9%		1.7%
Others	10.7%	8.9%	1.8%
Totals		78.9%	14.2%	6.9%

41 Byron

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen	77.2%	77.2%
Evans-Lehkonen	7.1%	7.1%
Evans	6.1%		6.1%
Suzuki-Anderson	3.2%	3.2%
Danault-Kotkaniemi	1.8%	1.8%
Others	4.7%	4.7%
Totals		93.9%	6.1%

62 Lehkonen

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi	72.7%	72.7%
Byron-Evans	6.7%	6.7%
Danault	6.0%		6.0%
Danault-Gallagher	2.5%	2.5%
Kotkaniemi-Anderson	2.3%	2.3%
Others	9.8%	8.3%	1.6%
Totals		92.5%	7.5%

67 Frolik

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Evans-Perry	72.4%	72.4%
Kotkaniemi-Perry	11.6%	11.6%
Evans-Anderson	6.8%	6.8%
Danault	3.6%	1.3%	2.3%
Evans-Lehkonen	1.9%	1.9%
Others	3.8%	3.8%
Totals		97.7%	2.3%

71 Evans

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Frolik-Perry	70.2%	70.2%
Byron-Lehkonen	7.8%	7.8%
Byron	6.7%		6.7%
Frolik-Anderson	6.6%	6.6%
Lehkonen	1.8%		1.8%
Others	6.9%	6.9%
Totals		91.5%	8.5%

90 Tatar

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Danault-Gallagher	69.7%	69.7%
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Perry	23.0%	0.2%	22.8%
Suzuki-Anderson	2.7%	2.7%
Suzuki-Gallagher	2.5%	2.5%
Evans-Perry	1.3%	1.3%
Others	0.8%	0.8%
Totals		77.2%	22.8%

92 Drouin

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Suzuki-Anderson	76.7%	76.7%
Suzuki-Anderson-Danault	12.1%	0.7%	11.5%
Danault-Anderson	2.5%	2.5%
Kotkaniemi-Anderson	2.3%	2.3%
Suzuki-Gallagher	2.2%	2.2%
Others	4.2%	4.2%
Totals		88.5%	11.5%

94 Perry

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Frolik-Evans	57.3%	57.3%
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Tatar	23.8%	0.2%	23.6%
Frolik-Kotkaniemi	9.2%	9.2%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Kotkaniemi	1.9%		1.9%
Danault-Gallagher	1.4%	0.8%	0.6%
Others	6.4%	5.0%	1.4%
Totals		72.5%	27.5%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Edmundson	82.1%	72.3%		9.8%
	12.8%	0.3%	12.5%
Petry	1.9%	1.9%
Kulak	1.2%	1.2%
Romanov	0.9%	0.9%
Others	1.1%	1.1%
Totals		77.7%	12.5%	9.8%

26 Petry

Partner	Total	EV	PP
Kulak	78.1%	78.1%
	14.6%	0.1%	14.5%
Edmundson	4.7%	4.3%	0.4%
Weber	1.9%	1.9%
Edmundson-Weber	0.7%	0.7%
Totals		85.1%	14.9%

27 Romanov

Partner	Total	EV
Mete	91.6%	91.6%
Edmundson	3.6%	3.6%
Kulak	3.1%	3.1%
Weber	1.3%	1.3%
	0.3%	0.3%
Totals		100.0%

44 Edmundson

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Weber	84.9%	74.8%		10.2%
Kulak	6.6%	6.6%
Petry	5.0%	4.6%	0.4%
Romanov	2.7%	2.7%
Weber-Petry	0.7%	0.7%
Totals		89.4%	0.4%	10.2%

53 Mete

Partner	Total	EV
Romanov	99.4%	99.4%
Weber	0.6%	0.6%
Totals		100.0%

77 Kulak

Partner	Total	EV
Petry	89.2%	89.2%
Edmundson	7.0%	7.0%
Romanov	2.5%	2.5%
Weber	1.3%	1.3%
Totals		100.0%

Back to main page