Game #05 - April 29, 2026 - Montreal 3 at Tampa Bay 2
Game #05 - April 29, 2026
  Montreal   3   at     Tampa Bay   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Caufield14 Suzuki17 Anderson
7:54 7:54 0:00 0:00 E
76 Bolduc77 Dach85 Texier
7:50 7:50 0:00 0:00 +2
15 Newhook24 Danault11 Gallagher
5:30 5:30 0:00 0:00 +1
20 Slafkovsky71 Evans93 Demidov
5:06 5:06 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault14 Suzuki20 Slafkovsky
2:25 2:25 0:00 0:00 E
13 Caufield - 14 Suzuki - 20 Slafkovsky - 93 Demidov 2:04 0:00 2:04 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans
1:49 0:10 0:00 1:39 E
17 Anderson24 Danault
1:46 0:00 0:00 1:46 E
20 Slafkovsky24 Danault93 Demidov
1:42 1:42 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson24 Danault71 Evans
1:22 1:10 0:12 0:00 E
15 Newhook24 Danault85 Texier
1:19 1:19 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki15 Newhook
1:13 0:00 0:00 1:13 E
20 Slafkovsky14 Suzuki93 Demidov
1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 -1
24 Danault14 Suzuki17 Anderson
1:00 1:00 0:00 0:00 E
Others 17:50 14:44 1:44 1:22 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Matheson45 Carrier
19:18 16:46 0:00 2:32 -1
21 Guhle48 Hutson
15:55 15:55 0:00 0:00 +1
47 Struble72 A. Xhekaj
8:12 8:12 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Matheson21 Guhle
4:15 1:51 0:00 2:24 E
48 Hutson
2:32 0:00 2:32 0:00 E
48 Hutson45 Carrier
2:09 1:19 0:15 0:35 E
  8 Matheson48 Hutson
1:32 1:32 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Matheson
1:13 0:00 1:13 0:00 E
Others 4:54 4:25 0:00 0:29 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13CC
14NS
17JA
76ZB
77KD
85AT
15AN
24PD
11BG
20JS
71JE
93ID
24PD
14NS
20JS
13CC
14NS
20JS
93ID
8MM
45AC
21KG
48LH
47JS
72AX
8MM
21KG
48LH 48LH
45AC
93 Goncalves - 17 James - 22 Bjorkstrand   1:28 1:42 1:06     1:34 4:06 2:41 0:03    
38 Hagel - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov 0:02 2:03 0:23 1:12     4:08 0:56   0:13    
38 Hagel - 71 Cirelli - 86 Kucherov 1:37 0:35         2:13 2:00   0:03    
37 Gourde - 71 Cirelli - 59 Guentzel 3:49 0:05         0:05 3:41   0:11    
37 Gourde - 21 Point - 59 Guentzel   1:02   1:25     1:24 1:10 0:08 0:20    
14 Geekie - 28 Girgensons - 10 Perry     2:02         0:08 2:22      
38 Hagel - 21 Point - 59 Guentzel - 86 Kucherov             1:38     1:21    
38 Hagel - 21 Point - 59 Guentzel - 71 Cirelli - 86 Kucherov         2:12   2:33          
                       
43 Raddysh - 90 Moser 3:28 3:02 0:29 2:13     6:47 5:11 0:57 0:39    
24 Crozier - 78 Lilleberg 0:23 3:41 1:56 0:31   0:45 1:28 5:02 3:11 0:04 0:50  
27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak 2:32 0:19 1:40 1:38 0:13   3:37 3:33 1:49 0:28   0:38
43 Raddysh         2:12   5:05     2:16   0:07
24 Crozier - 27 McDonagh 1:07   0:44       0:50 0:25 0:09 0:08   0:30
81 Cernak - 90 Moser 0:17         1:18 0:02 0:29 0:02   1:40 0:15
                       

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Danault 80.9% 80.9%    
Slafkovsky-Danault 4.7% 4.7%    
Caufield-Evans 4.4% 4.4%    
Newhook-Evans 3.2% 3.2%    
Bolduc-Dach 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Anderson 59.8% 59.8%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Demidov 15.6%   15.6%  
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 5.8% 5.8%    
Suzuki-Texier 3.5% 3.5%    
Evans-Slafkovsky 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 12.0% 10.8% 1.1%  
Totals   83.2% 16.8%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Anderson 38.2% 38.2%    
Danault-Slafkovsky 11.7% 11.7%    
Caufield-Slafkovsky-Demidov 10.0%   10.0%  
Newhook 5.9%     5.9%
Slafkovsky-Demidov 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 28.7% 28.2% 0.3% 0.2%
Totals   83.7% 10.3% 6.0%
15 Newhook
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 37.7% 37.7%    
Evans 12.5% 1.1%   11.3%
Danault-Texier 9.0% 9.0%    
Suzuki 8.3%     8.3%
Bolduc-Dach-Texier 6.6%   6.6%  
Others 25.8% 21.4%   4.5%
Totals   69.3% 6.6% 24.1%
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 51.0% 51.0%    
Danault 11.4%     11.4%
Danault-Evans 8.8% 7.5% 1.3%  
Danault-Suzuki 6.5% 6.5%    
Slafkovsky-Suzuki 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 16.6% 12.3%   4.3%
Totals   83.0% 1.3% 15.7%
20 Slafkovsky
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Demidov 26.2% 26.2%    
Danault-Suzuki 12.4% 12.4%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Demidov 10.6%   10.6%  
Danault-Demidov 8.7% 8.7%    
Suzuki-Demidov 6.0% 6.0%    
Others 36.0% 32.0% 3.7% 0.3%
Totals   85.4% 14.3% 0.3%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Gallagher 28.0% 28.0%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 12.3% 12.3%    
Anderson 9.0%     9.0%
Slafkovsky-Demidov 8.6% 8.6%    
Anderson-Evans 6.9% 5.9% 1.0%  
Others 35.2% 31.7% 0.2% 3.3%
Totals   86.5% 1.2% 12.3%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Slafkovsky-Demidov 33.5% 33.5%    
Newhook 11.9% 1.1%   10.8%
Anderson-Danault 9.0% 7.7% 1.3%  
Newhook-Danault 6.0% 6.0%    
Slafkovsky-Texier 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 34.4% 30.1% 0.1% 4.2%
Totals   83.6% 1.4% 15.0%
76 Bolduc
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dach-Texier 58.3% 58.3%    
Newhook-Dach-Texier 7.2%   7.2%  
Dach-Slafkovsky 5.3% 5.3%    
Evans-Texier 5.2% 5.2%    
Evans-Dach 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 19.9% 16.0% 3.8%  
Totals   89.0% 11.0%  
77 Dach
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Texier 66.6% 66.6%    
Newhook-Bolduc-Texier 8.2%   8.2%  
Bolduc-Slafkovsky 6.1% 6.1%    
Bolduc-Evans 4.7% 4.7%    
Slafkovsky-Bolduc-Texier 4.4%   4.4%  
Others 10.1% 8.6% 1.4%  
Totals   86.0% 14.0%  
85 Texier
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Dach 57.2% 57.2%    
Newhook-Danault 9.6% 9.6%    
Newhook-Bolduc-Dach 7.1%   7.1%  
Slafkovsky-Evans 5.8% 5.8%    
Bolduc-Evans 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 15.2% 10.9% 4.3%  
Totals   88.7% 11.3%  
93 Demidov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Slafkovsky-Evans 45.9% 45.9%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky 18.6%   18.6%  
Slafkovsky-Danault 15.3% 15.3%    
Slafkovsky-Suzuki 10.5% 10.5%    
Slafkovsky 3.4% 3.0%   0.4%
Others 6.3% 4.0% 2.2%  
Totals   78.7% 20.8% 0.4%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Matheson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Carrier 69.2% 60.1%   9.1%
Guhle 15.2% 6.6%   8.6%
Hutson 5.5% 5.5%    
  4.4%   4.4%  
A. Xhekaj 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   78.0% 4.4% 17.7%
21 Guhle
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hutson 73.4% 73.4%    
Matheson 19.6% 8.5%   11.1%
Carrier 4.0% 1.8%   2.2%
Struble 1.4% 1.4%    
Hutson-Carrier 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   86.7%   13.3%
45 Carrier
Partner Total EV PP SH
Matheson 82.3% 71.5%   10.8%
Hutson 9.2% 5.6% 1.1% 2.5%
Guhle 3.7% 1.6%   2.1%
Struble 2.3% 2.3%    
A. Xhekaj 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   83.6% 1.1% 15.4%
47 Struble
Partner Total EV PP SH
A. Xhekaj 79.0% 79.0%    
Hutson 5.9% 5.9%    
Carrier 5.1% 5.1%    
Matheson 4.7% 4.7%    
Guhle 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
48 Hutson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Guhle 67.7% 67.7%    
  10.8%   10.8%  
Carrier 9.1% 5.6% 1.1% 2.5%
Matheson 6.5% 6.5%    
Struble 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   85.7% 11.8% 2.5%
72 A. Xhekaj
Partner Total EV PP SH
Struble 82.8% 82.8%    
Matheson 8.6% 8.6%    
Hutson 3.7% 3.7%    
Carrier 2.4% 2.4%    
Hutson-Carrier 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   100.0%    

Back to main page