Game #06 - May 1, 2026 - Tampa Bay 1 at Montreal 0 (OT)
Game #06 - May 1, 2026
  Tampa Bay   1   at     Montreal   0     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
76 Bolduc77 Dach85 Texier
 10:08 9:55 0:13 0:00 -1
13 Caufield14 Suzuki20 Slafkovsky
 9:21 9:21 0:00 0:00 E
13 Caufield - 14 Suzuki - 20 Slafkovsky - 93 Demidov 4:23 0:00 4:23 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans
 3:57 0:06 0:00 3:51 E
13 Caufield14 Suzuki17 Anderson
 3:47 3:47 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson24 Danault93 Demidov
 3:45 3:45 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson24 Danault71 Evans
 3:33 3:33 0:00 0:00 E
20 Slafkovsky24 Danault93 Demidov
 2:51 2:51 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson24 Danault
 2:16 0:10 0:00 2:06 E
17 Anderson71 Evans93 Demidov
 2:11 2:11 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook24 Danault11 Gallagher
 1:45 1:45 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans85 Texier
 1:23 1:23 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans11 Gallagher
 1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
76 Bolduc24 Danault85 Texier
 1:18 1:18 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans93 Demidov
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
Others 16:00 14:33 1:24 0:03 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Matheson45 Carrier
 21:02 17:46 0:29 2:47 E
21 Guhle48 Hutson
 17:08 17:08 0:00 0:00 E
47 Struble72 A. Xhekaj
 9:18 9:18 0:00 0:00 E
48 Hutson
 5:12 0:00 5:11 0:01 E
  8 Matheson21 Guhle
 5:01 2:52 0:00 2:09 E
48 Hutson45 Carrier
 2:54 2:20 0:01 0:33 E
47 Struble48 Hutson
 2:24 2:24 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Matheson48 Hutson
 1:46 1:19 0:00 0:27 E
21 Guhle72 A. Xhekaj
 1:23 1:23 0:00 0:00 -1
72 A. Xhekaj48 Hutson
 1:00 1:00 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:55 1:33 0:19 0:03 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 76ZB
77KD
85AT		 13CC
14NS
20JS		 13CC
14NS
20JS
93ID		 15AN
71JE		 13CC
14NS
17JA		 17JA
24PD
93ID		 17JA
24PD
71JE		 20JS
24PD
93ID		 17JA
24PD		 17JA
71JE
93ID		 8MM
45AC		 21KG
48LH		 47JS
72AX		 48LH 8MM
21KG		 48LH
45AC		 47JS
48LH
38 Hagel - 71 Cirelli - 86 Kucherov 1:38 3:36     1:52 1:16 0:20 0:22   1:23 9:15 1:14 0:18   1:26 0:12 0:33
17 James - 93 Goncalves - 22 Bjorkstrand 2:27 0:57       0:51 0:01   0:01   0:32 1:48 4:40   0:09   0:24
28 Girgensons - 20 Paul - 37 Gourde 0:42 1:25       0:28 0:51 2:01     0:22 5:05 1:54        
21 Point - 59 Guentzel - 10 Perry 1:49 0:07     1:00 0:34       0:45 1:19 3:28 0:25   0:08 0:02 0:29
38 Hagel - 71 Cirelli 0:58   1:51               1:13 1:20   2:36 0:03 0:01  
38 Hagel - 21 Point - 59 Guentzel - 86 Kucherov       3:15   0:03     1:51   2:47     0:01 1:53 0:02  
27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak 2:41 3:31 2:24   1:29 0:03 0:57 0:29     4:22 6:02 1:55 2:31 0:25 1:20 0:21
43 Raddysh - 90 Moser 1:44 2:56     1:40 2:02 0:43 0:38   2:03 7:59 2:07 1:39   1:46 0:21 0:32
51 D'Astous - 78 Lilleberg 2:38 0:54     0:25   1:00 1:15     1:20 3:27 3:59     0:07 0:31
43 Raddysh       3:15   0:03     1:58   2:47     0:01 1:53 0:09  
78 Lilleberg - 90 Moser 0:57 0:15 1:54       0:01       0:16 0:09 0:05 2:30 0:25    
43 Raddysh - 51 D'Astous 0:30 0:02   0:06     0:50 0:21 0:04 0:05 2:22 0:43 0:22   0:06 0:04  
81 Cernak - 90 Moser   0:35       1:19           1:52 0:48   0:03 0:04 0:01

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Danault 31.0% 31.0%    
Newhook-Evans 24.2% 24.2%    
Evans-Danault 12.7% 12.7%    
Demidov-Newhook 12.7% 12.7%    
Bolduc-Newhook 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 15.3% 15.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 47.5% 47.5%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Demidov 22.3%   22.3%  
Suzuki-Anderson 19.2% 19.2%    
Suzuki 4.5% 4.5%    
Suzuki-Demidov 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 4.4% 4.3% 0.1%  
Totals   77.6% 22.4%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Slafkovsky 37.5% 37.5%    
Caufield-Slafkovsky-Demidov 17.6%   17.6%  
Caufield-Anderson 15.2% 15.2%    
Bolduc-Slafkovsky 3.7% 3.7%    
Caufield 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 22.5% 20.7% 1.7%  
Totals   80.7% 19.3%  
15 Newhook
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans 27.2% 0.7%   26.5%
Danault-Gallagher 12.1% 12.1%    
Evans-Texier 9.5% 9.5%    
Evans-Gallagher 9.4% 9.4%    
Evans-Demidov 7.2% 7.2%    
Others 34.6% 28.2% 6.2% 0.1%
Totals   67.2% 6.2% 26.6%
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 20.0% 20.0%    
Danault-Demidov 19.9% 19.9%    
Danault-Evans 18.8% 18.8%    
Danault 12.0% 0.9%   11.1%
Evans-Demidov 11.6% 11.6%    
Others 17.7% 17.5%   0.3%
Totals   88.6%   11.4%
20 Slafkovsky
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 41.5% 41.5%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Demidov 19.5%   19.5%  
Danault-Demidov 12.7% 12.7%    
Bolduc-Suzuki 4.1% 4.1%    
Evans-Demidov 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 19.1% 18.0% 1.1%  
Totals   79.4% 20.6%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Anderson-Demidov 19.2% 19.2%    
Anderson-Evans 18.2% 18.2%    
Slafkovsky-Demidov 14.6% 14.6%    
Anderson 11.6% 0.9%   10.8%
Newhook-Gallagher 9.0% 9.0%    
Others 27.4% 27.3%   0.1%
Totals   89.2%   10.8%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook 24.5% 0.6%   23.9%
Anderson-Danault 22.0% 22.0%    
Anderson-Demidov 13.5% 13.5%    
Newhook-Texier 8.6% 8.6%    
Newhook-Gallagher 8.5% 8.5%    
Others 22.9% 22.9%    
Totals   76.1%   23.9%
76 Bolduc
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dach-Texier 64.7% 63.4% 1.4%  
Danault-Texier 8.3% 8.3%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 5.9% 5.9%    
Newhook-Dach-Texier 5.5%   5.5%  
Newhook-Texier 3.7% 3.5% 0.2%  
Others 11.8% 8.9% 2.9%  
Totals   90.0% 10.0%  
77 Dach
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Texier 83.4% 81.6% 1.8%  
Newhook-Bolduc-Texier 7.1%   7.1%  
Bolduc-Suzuki 3.6% 1.5% 2.1%  
Danault-Texier 1.1% 1.1%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Bolduc 0.8%   0.8%  
Others 4.0% 3.4% 0.5%  
Totals   87.7% 12.3%  
85 Texier
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Dach 59.3% 58.0% 1.3%  
Newhook-Evans 8.1% 8.1%    
Bolduc-Danault 7.6% 7.6%    
Newhook-Bolduc-Dach 5.1%   5.1%  
Anderson-Danault 5.0% 5.0%    
Others 14.9% 14.4% 0.5%  
Totals   93.2% 6.8%  
93 Demidov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky 24.9%   24.9%  
Anderson-Danault 21.3% 21.3%    
Slafkovsky-Danault 16.2% 16.2%    
Anderson-Evans 12.4% 12.4%    
Newhook-Evans 6.0% 6.0%    
Others 19.4% 18.6% 0.8%  
Totals   74.4% 25.6%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Matheson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Carrier 73.1% 61.7% 1.7% 9.7%
Guhle 17.4% 10.0%   7.5%
Hutson 6.1% 4.6%   1.6%
Struble 1.5% 1.5%    
  1.3% 0.2% 1.1%  
Others 0.5% 0.4%   0.1%
Totals   78.4% 2.8% 18.8%
21 Guhle
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hutson 70.7% 70.7%    
Matheson 20.7% 11.8%   8.9%
A. Xhekaj 5.7% 5.7%    
Struble 1.4% 1.4%    
Hutson-Carrier 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.9% 0.7%   0.2%
Totals   90.9%   9.1%
45 Carrier
Partner Total EV PP SH
Matheson 85.9% 72.6% 2.0% 11.4%
Hutson 11.8% 9.5% 0.1% 2.2%
Struble 1.3% 1.3%    
Guhle-Hutson 0.6% 0.6%    
Matheson-Guhle 0.3% 0.1%   0.1%
Others 0.1%     0.1%
Totals   84.1% 2.0% 13.8%
47 Struble
Partner Total EV PP SH
A. Xhekaj 72.0% 72.0%    
Hutson 18.6% 18.6%    
Matheson 3.4% 3.4%    
Guhle 2.6% 2.6%    
Carrier 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
48 Hutson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Guhle 55.7% 55.7%    
  16.9%   16.9% 0.1%
Carrier 9.4% 7.6% 0.1% 1.8%
Struble 7.8% 7.8%    
Matheson 5.7% 4.3%   1.5%
Others 4.3% 4.3%    
Totals   79.8% 16.9% 3.3%
72 A. Xhekaj
Partner Total EV PP SH
Struble 79.0% 79.0%    
Guhle 11.8% 11.8%    
Hutson 8.5% 8.5%    
Struble-Hutson 0.3% 0.3%    
Guhle-Hutson 0.3% 0.3%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page