Game #61 - March 2, 2024 - Montreal 3 at Tampa Bay 4 (SO)
Game #61 - March 2, 2024
  Montreal   3   at     Tampa Bay   4     (SO)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
22 Caufield14 Suzuki20 Slafkovsky
15:44 15:25 0:19 0:00 -1
11 Gallagher71 Evans17 Anderson
11:42 11:42 0:00 0:00 +1
89 Roy15 Newhook40 Armia
10:01 10:01 0:00 0:00 E
70 Pearson36 White56 Ylonen
6:59 6:59 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 15 Newhook - 20 Slafkovsky - 22 Caufield 1:56 0:00 1:56 0:00 -1
11 Gallagher - 17 Anderson - 56 Ylonen - 89 Roy 1:37 0:00 1:37 0:00 E
70 Pearson15 Newhook40 Armia
1:29 1:29 0:00 0:00 E
71 Evans
1:27 0:16 0:00 1:11 E
14 Suzuki22 Caufield
1:25 1:25 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook20 Slafkovsky
1:07 1:07 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki70 Pearson
1:01 0:02 0:00 0:59 E
Others 10:32 8:34 0:08 1:50 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Matheson21 Guhle
17:01 16:15 0:22 0:24 E
72 Xhekaj58 Savard
14:27 14:27 0:00 0:00 E
54 Harris26 Kovacevic
10:54 10:47 0:00 0:07 +1
  8 Matheson58 Savard
5:26 2:27 0:00 2:59 E
54 Harris58 Savard
4:37 4:07 0:00 0:30 E
  8 Matheson
2:24 0:28 1:56 0:00 -1
21 Guhle58 Savard
2:15 2:11 0:04 0:00 E
  8 Matheson54 Harris
1:33 1:33 0:00 0:00 E
21 Guhle
1:26 0:41 0:45 0:00 E
  8 Matheson26 Kovacevic
1:16 1:16 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:41 2:48 0:53 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 22CC
14NS
20JS
11BG
71JE
17JA
89JR
15AN
40JA
70TP
36CW
56JY
8MM
21KG
72AX
58DS
54JH
26JK
8MM
58DS
54JH
58DS
8MM 21KG
58DS
21 Point - 91 Stamkos - 86 Kucherov 0:29 3:44 3:15 1:04 6:50 1:05 0:21 2:13 0:29   0:30
38 Hagel - 71 Cirelli - 41 Chaffee 5:57 0:05 0:02   1:38 2:47 0:54 0:19 1:03   0:44
73 Sheary - 11 Glendening - 64 Motte 0:32 1:37 0:04 1:42 0:08 1:41 2:38   0:04   0:01
38 Hagel - 71 Cirelli 0:19       0:19         1:09  
73 Sheary - 20 Paul - 23 Eyssimont   1:43 0:39 1:04 0:27 0:55 2:24        
38 Hagel - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov 1:27 0:12 0:45 0:39 2:14   0:29 0:11      
23 Eyssimont - 71 Cirelli - 41 Chaffee 1:21 0:53     0:05 2:09   0:05      
20 Paul - 91 Stamkos - 86 Kucherov 0:09   1:32 0:30 1:59 0:12   0:03      
64 Motte - 11 Glendening - 41 Chaffee   0:39 0:17 0:27 0:04 1:03 0:33 0:08 0:17    
7 Fleury - 81 Cernak 10:01 0:34 0:43 0:03 3:36 4:29 1:41 0:51 0:43   1:00
65 Crozier - 77 Hedman 2:09 3:29 2:58 1:30 5:55 1:24 2:04 0:03 0:47   0:21
48 Perbix - 78 Lilleberg 0:41 3:44 2:19 1:46 1:46 3:14 3:03 0:41 0:39   0:05
43 Raddysh - 77 Hedman 0:27 1:54 0:52 1:52 2:43 1:07 0:51 0:19 0:13    
77 Hedman         0:24     3:06 0:30 0:16 0:16
7 Fleury - 48 Perbix 0:21   0:43 0:29 0:25 0:51 0:34 0:18 0:33    
77 Hedman - 81 Cernak 0:47   0:33   0:58 0:26 0:01     0:48  
43 Raddysh - 78 Lilleberg   0:41   0:47 0:07 1:01 1:04 0:08     0:11
65 Crozier - 78 Lilleberg   1:01 0:44 0:06 0:21 0:46 0:44   0:09    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Anderson 80.7% 80.7%    
Anderson-Ylonen-Roy 11.1%   11.1%  
Anderson-Ylonen 1.4% 0.9% 0.5%  
Pearson-White 1.3% 1.3%    
Evans-Slafkovsky 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 4.4% 4.3% 0.1%  
Totals   88.3% 11.7%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Slafkovsky 68.0% 66.6% 1.4%  
Newhook-Slafkovsky-Caufield 8.4%   8.4%  
Caufield 6.1% 6.1%    
Pearson 4.4% 0.1%   4.3%
  3.5%     3.5%
Others 9.6% 9.3% 0.3%  
Totals   82.2% 10.0% 7.8%
15 Newhook
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Roy-Armia 61.4% 61.4%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Caufield 11.8%   11.8%  
Pearson-Armia 9.1% 9.1%    
Slafkovsky 6.8% 6.8%    
Roy-Anderson 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 8.0% 7.6% 0.4%  
Totals   87.7% 12.3%  
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Gallagher-Evans 74.0% 74.0%    
Gallagher-Ylonen-Roy 10.2%   10.2%  
Caufield-Suzuki 3.7% 3.7%    
Roy-Newhook 3.0% 3.0%    
Pearson-Evans 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 6.5% 6.1% 0.4%  
Totals   89.4% 10.6%  
20 Slafkovsky
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 75.3% 73.8% 1.5%  
Suzuki-Newhook-Caufield 9.3%   9.3%  
Newhook 5.3% 5.3%    
Caufield-Evans 2.2% 2.2%    
Caufield-Newhook 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 5.9% 5.9%    
Totals   89.2% 10.8%  
22 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 73.1% 71.6% 1.5%  
Suzuki-Newhook-Slafkovsky 9.0%   9.0%  
Suzuki 6.6% 6.6%    
Suzuki-Anderson 2.7% 2.7%    
Evans-Slafkovsky 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 6.5% 6.4% 0.1%  
Totals   89.5% 10.5%  
36 White
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pearson-Ylonen 78.3% 78.3%    
Pearson-Armia 6.7% 6.7%    
Armia-Ylonen 3.7% 3.7%    
Pearson-Slafkovsky 3.2% 3.2%    
Pearson-Gallagher 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 6.0% 4.7%   1.3%
Totals   98.7%   1.3%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Roy-Newhook 67.5% 67.5%    
Pearson-Newhook 10.0% 10.0%    
Evans 6.1%     6.1%
Pearson-Evans 4.5% 4.5%    
Pearson-White 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 7.9% 7.9%    
Totals   93.9%   6.1%
56 Ylonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pearson-White 67.5% 67.5%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Roy 15.6%   15.6%  
Pearson-Evans 4.3% 4.3%    
Armia-White 3.2% 3.2%    
Caufield-Suzuki 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 7.2% 6.6% 0.6%  
Totals   83.7% 16.3%  
70 Pearson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
White-Ylonen 53.1% 53.1%    
Newhook-Armia 11.3% 11.3%    
Suzuki 7.7% 0.3%   7.5%
Evans-Armia 5.1% 5.1%    
White-Armia 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 18.3% 17.4%   0.9%
Totals   91.6%   8.4%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Gallagher-Anderson 69.2% 69.2%    
  8.6% 1.6%   7.0%
Armia 5.3%     5.3%
Pearson-Armia 3.9% 3.9%    
Caufield-Slafkovsky 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 10.2% 10.2%    
Totals   87.7%   12.3%
89 Roy
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Armia 77.4% 77.4%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Ylonen 12.5%   12.5%  
Newhook-Anderson 3.6% 3.6%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 2.1% 2.1%    
Evans-Anderson 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 2.4% 2.1% 0.4%  
Totals   87.1% 12.9%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Matheson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Guhle 60.6% 57.8% 1.3% 1.4%
Savard 19.3% 8.7%   10.6%
  8.5% 1.7% 6.9%  
Harris 5.5% 5.5%    
Kovacevic 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   79.8% 8.2% 12.0%
21 Guhle
Partner Total EV PP SH
Matheson 75.7% 72.3% 1.6% 1.8%
Savard 10.0% 9.7% 0.3%  
  6.4% 3.0% 3.3%  
Kovacevic 3.3% 3.3%    
Harris 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   93.0% 5.3% 1.8%
26 Kovacevic
Partner Total EV PP SH
Harris 82.3% 81.4%   0.9%
Matheson 9.6% 9.6%    
Guhle 5.7% 5.7%    
Xhekaj 1.8% 1.8%    
Matheson-Harris 0.3% 0.3%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   99.1%   0.9%
54 Harris
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kovacevic 60.4% 59.7%   0.6%
Savard 25.6% 22.8%   2.8%
Matheson 8.6% 8.6%    
Guhle 3.5% 3.5%    
Xhekaj 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   96.6%   3.4%
58 Savard
Partner Total EV PP SH
Xhekaj 53.9% 53.9%    
Matheson 20.2% 9.1%   11.1%
Harris 17.2% 15.3%   1.9%
Guhle 8.4% 8.1% 0.2%  
  0.1% 0.1%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   86.8% 0.2% 13.0%
72 Xhekaj
Partner Total EV PP SH
Savard 87.0% 87.0%    
  5.3%   5.3%  
Matheson 2.4% 2.4%    
Guhle 2.1% 2.1%    
Harris 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   94.7% 5.3%  

Back to main page